Expression profiling in Rpp2-resistant (PI230970) and susceptible (Embrapa-48) plant lines to soybean rust from infection to symptom development
Distinct Biphasic mRNA Changes in Response to Asian Soybean Rust Infection
Specimen part, Time
View SamplesA model system of Potyvirus turnip mosaic virus and Arabidopsis was used in this experiment. GFP-tagged virus supplied a visualized marker for us to localize the viral infection foci and its expansion on leaf under UV light. Initially, we dissect an individual infection focus and its adjacent region into four parts and define those four parts as zone 0, 1, 2, and 3, which represented different viral infection stages respectively. Corresponding fours parts were also dissected from control plant treated with turnip leaf sap only. This process was replicated three times totally.
Spatial analysis of arabidopsis thaliana gene expression in response to Turnip mosaic virus infection.
Age, Specimen part
View SamplesA large-scale parallel expression analysis was conducted to elucidate Mla-specified responses to powdery mildew infection using 22K Barley1 GeneChip probe arrays. Our goal was to identify genes differentially expressed in incompatible (resistant) vs. compatible (susceptible) and Mla-specified Rar1-dependent vs. -independent interactions. A split-split-plot design with 108 experimental units (3 replications x 2 isolates x 3 genotypes x 6 time points) was used to profile near-isogenic lines containing the Mla1, Mla6, and Mla13 resistance specificities in response to inoculation with the Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei (Bgh) isolates 5874 (AvrMla1, AvrMla6) and K1 (AvrMla1, AvrMla13).
Interaction-dependent gene expression in Mla-specified response to barley powdery mildew.
Age, Specimen part, Disease, Disease stage, Cell line, Time
View SamplesExpression analysis was performed on total RNA from the Q21861 and SM89010 barley lines, and 75 derived doubled haploid progeny, with CI 16137 included as an internal Mla1 allele control. Samples were blocked by time-point and completely randomized within each block. For each sample, seven day old seedlings were inoculated with Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei (Bgh) isolate 5874 (AVRa1, AVRa6, AVRa12), and first leaves were collected at 16 and 32 hours after inoculation (HAI). ****[PLEXdb(http://www.plexdb.org) has submitted this series at GEO on behalf of the original contributor, Roger Wise. The equivalent experiment is BB96 at PLEXdb.]
No associated publication
Age, Specimen part, Time
View SamplesBud endodormancy induction response of two genotypes (Seyval a hybrid white wine grape and V. riparia, PI588259 a native north american species) was compared under long and short photoperiod. Three separate replicates (5 plants/replicate) were treated in each of 2 separate years (2007 and 2008) to generate paradormant (LD) and same aged endodormancy-induced (SD) buds for transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic analysis. Potted, spur-pruned two to six-year-old vines were removed from cold storage (Seyval 3-19-07, 3/18/08; V. riparia 3/26/07, 3/24/08) and grown under a LD (15 h) at 25/20 + 3C day/night temperatures (D/N). When vines reached 12-15 nodes they were randomized into groups for differential photoperiod treatments. On 4/30/07 and 4/28/08 LD and SD (13 h) treatments were imposed with automated photoperiod system (VRE Greenhouse Systems). Temperatures were maintained at 25/20 + 3C D/N. Three replications (5 vines/replication) were harvested between 5/07-6/07 and then again in 5/08-6/08. At 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28 and 42 days of differential photoperiod treatment, buds were harvested from nodes 3 to 12 (from the base of the shoot) of each separate replicate, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and placed at -80C for future RNA, protein and metabolite extraction. These time points encompass early reversible phases as well as key time points during transition to irreversible endodormancy development. After photoperiod treatments and bud harvests, all pruned vines were returned to LD and monitored for bud endodormancy. The endodormant vines were identified after 28 days and moved to cold storage. The nondormant vines were allowed to grow again and induced into dormancy at a later date. Acknowledgement:This study was funded by NSF Grant DBI0604755 and funds from the South Dakota Agriculture Experiment Station. ****[PLEXdb(http://www.plexdb.org) has submitted this series at GEO on behalf of the original contributor, Anne Fennell. The equivalent experiment is VV18 at PLEXdb.]
Short day transcriptomic programming during induction of dormancy in grapevine.
Age, Specimen part
View SamplesThe QxSM doubled-haploid mapping population was generated from a single Q21861 x SM89010 F1 plant (Borovkova et al. 1995; Steffenson et al. 1995). Four flats (each flat contained 75 DH lines + 4 replicates of each parent = 81 cones/flat) were grown in a completely randomized design at the ARS Cereal Disease Lab, University of Minnesota, St. Paul. The four flats were divided into two replicates of two flats each. Nine days after sowing, one flat of each replicate was inoculated (INOC) with TTKS urediniospores were suspended in Soltrol oil with an inoculum weight of 0.25 mg per flat and the other was mock-inoculated (MOCK). Each (MOCK and INOC) replicate was incubated in its own dew chamber overnight. After inoculation, replicates were placed in separate mist chambers for 16 hours in the dark, followed by lights for 5 hours, and then moved to the greenhouse for 2 hours. The growth stage of barley was first leaf unfolded (PO:0007094) and five seedlings were harvested and placed in liquid nitrogen for each line in the population within a 1.5 hour period at 24 hours after inoculation (hai). ****[PLEXdb(http://www.plexdb.org) has submitted this series at GEO on behalf of the original contributor, Roger P. Wise. The equivalent experiment is BB64 at PLEXdb.]
No associated publication
Specimen part
View SamplesA split-split-plot design with 144 experimental units (3 replications x 4 genotypes x 6 time points x 2 treatment types) was used to profile barley plants containing variants of Mla1 and Mla6 powdery mildew resistance genes in response to inoculation with the Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei (Bgh) isolates 5874 (AvrMla1, AvrMla6). Barley leaves were harvested from inoculated and non-inoculated plants at 6 time points (0,8,16,20,24 and 32 hrs) after Bgh inoculation. ****[PLEXdb(http://www.plexdb.org) has submitted this series at GEO on behalf of the original contributor, Rico Caldo. The equivalent experiment is BB10 at PLEXdb.]
Blufensin1 negatively impacts basal defense in response to barley powdery mildew.
Specimen part, Time
View SamplesExperimental design: 2 genotypes: PI230970 (resistant USDA Plant Introduction (PI) line containing SBR Rpp2 resistance gene) & Embrapa-48 (susceptible Brazilian cultivar) 2 treatments: Soybean rust challenge & mock infection 3 replications 10 time points: 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 168hai TOTAL: 120 Affymetrix GeneChip(R) Soybean Genome Arrays ****[PLEXdb(http://www.plexdb.org) has submitted this series at GEO on behalf of the original contributor, Martijn van de Mortel. The equivalent experiment is GM2 at PLEXdb.]
Distinct biphasic mRNA changes in response to Asian soybean rust infection.
Specimen part, Time
View SamplesA large-scale parallel expression analysis was conducted to elucidate Mla-specified responses to powdery mildew infection using 22K Barley1 GeneChip probe arrays. Our goal was to identify genes differentially expressed in incompatible (resistant) vs. compatible (susceptible) and Mla-specified Rar1-dependent vs. -independent interactions. A split-split-plot design with 108 experimental units (3 replications x 2 isolates x 3 genotypes x 6 time points) was used to profile near-isogenic lines containing the Mla1, Mla6, and Mla13 resistance specificities in response to inoculation with the Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei (Bgh) isolates 5874 (AvrMla1, AvrMla6) and K1 (AvrMla1, AvrMla13). ****[PLEXdb(http://www.plexdb.org) has submitted this series at GEO on behalf of the original contributor, Rico Caldo. The equivalent experiment is BB4 at PLEXdb.]
Interaction-dependent gene expression in Mla-specified response to barley powdery mildew.
Specimen part, Time
View SamplesTranscriptome comparison of 15 lines representing the University of Minnesota six-rowed malting breeding program at two time points of the malting process: 'out of steep' and '3 days of germination'. Three replicates of each genotype and time point were accomplished. ****[PLEXdb(http://www.plexdb.org) has submitted this series at GEO on behalf of the original contributor, Maria Muoz-Amatriain. The equivalent experiment is BB91 at PLEXdb.]
Transcriptome analysis of a barley breeding program examines gene expression diversity and reveals target genes for malting quality improvement.
Age, Specimen part
View Samples